"/>

        欧美精品在线第一页,久久av影院,午夜视频在线播放一三,久久91精品久久久久久秒播,成人一区三区,久久综合狠狠综合久久狠狠色综合,成人av一区二区亚洲精,欧美a级在线观看

        California's rebellious "sanctuary state" law faces rebellion

        Source: Xinhua    2018-05-07 05:05:01

        By Peter Mertz

        LOS ANGELES, May 6 (Xinhua) -- California conservative lawmakers continued this week to support Trump Administration immigration policy, a move that enflamed again the war of words in the state and feud between the America's most populous state and Washington.

        TANGLED LAW WARFARE

        California made history by becoming the first "Sanctuary State" in the country as a new law, which was called SB (Senate Bill) 54 before being signed by Governor Jerry Brown last October, showing a will to resist the White House's immigration policy, went into effect from the first day of this year.

        Then the Golden State had to face pressure from the federal government for its rebellious move. Early March, the Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against the state, its governor, and its attorney general, accusing them of violating the U.S. Constitution.

        This legal move was compared by Jerry Brown to "an act of war", but more challenges to the law, which vastly limits cooperation between state and local law enforcement officers with the federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, emerged inside his state.

        Costa Mesa, a tiny city of 110,000 residents south of Los Angeles, made another loud national statement with a 3-2 vote last Wednesday to oppose the state's "sanctuary state" law. It is the latest Orange County governing body to declare official opposition.

        The opposition to SB 54 started in March when Orange County's second-smallest city - Los Alamitos - voted 4-1 to exempt itself from California's sanctuary law.

        That move triggered Orange County's Republican-controlled county council to vote unanimously later that month to do the same - defy the state sanctuary laws - and move immigration control to the local level.

        County council members in the majority said SB-54 puts them at odds with the U.S. Constitution and also joined the federal lawsuit against California's sanctuary laws.

        Orange County lawmakers cited examples of "illegal" immigrants convicted of domestic violence that were re-released into the public, while liberal opponents voiced dismay at a move that will target minority populations.

        California Attorney General Xavier Becerra said he would fight Orange County in court, as all sides prepared for battle. "State law is state law," Becerra said in a news conference last month.

        "We want to make sure that every jurisdiction, including Orange County, understands what state law requires of the people and the subdivisions of the state of California," he said, warning "It's my job to enforce state law and I will do so."

        But now Becerra must file a long list of defendants to the court if he launched a law war against the rebellious cities. Besides of Costa Mesa, at least another 13 cities in Orange County voted against the "sanctuary law" and the neighbour San Diego County also decided to back Trump' s challenge against the state on this issue.

        CLEAR DIVISION LINE

        "Costa Mesa has been a conservative stronghold since the Nixon and Reagan years," said San Luis Obispo business owner John Ott.

        "Lots of rich, retired white folk live there - not a surprise vote - in fact, I'm surprised it was so close," Ott told Xinhua Friday.

        Orange County is more populous than 21 U.S. states, the sixth most populous country in America, and has only voted for only one democratic presidential candidate since 1936, who was Hillary Clinton.

        "The 3-2 Costa Mesa vote was not unanimous - in fact very close," said Hollywood film editor Tim Craig, "Hey, it's Orange County, what else would you expect?"

        The debate in Costa Mesa city council Wednesday morning was unexpected fierce. More than 100 people spoke on the issue over more than four hours in front of a large and sometimes rowdy crowd.

        People in the audience expressed both sides of the issue, waving American flags and holding signs with messages such as "Immigrants in, racists out," "You must uphold the Constitution," "Respect our country" and "I support safe communities, I support SB 54."

        Chairwomen of the meeting repeatedly admonished the audience for interrupting speakers with applause or boos. Several times she threatened to clear the chamber if the crowd didn't pipe down, and she asked police officers to temporarily remove people who were being disruptive.

        Costa Mesa's vote dismayed civil rights groups across America.

        "America is going backwards...marching to the Trump manifesto," political analyst David B. Richardson told Xinhua Saturday.

        "There's been a real shift to a national, xenophobic acceptability in our society that is heartbreaking," said Rabbi Jonathan Klein, executive director of the Clergy & Laity United for Economic Justice group on Twitter.

        "We're in an era of open bigotry," Klein said.

        "It has nothing to do with bigotry," countered former U.S. Navy engineer Kirk Blue. "Police are trained to protect the public and if that means including demographic data, then it's crazy to hamper their work," he told Xinhua.

        "Clearly the residents of Orange County want more law enforcement, not less," Blue said Saturday.

        MORE SAFEY?

        Costa Mesa's council members who supported the resolution said what they concerned most about SB 54 is that in many cases it prohibits local and state police agencies from notifying federal officials when they're about to release immigrants in their custody who may be subject to deportation.

        "If you are putting people back on the street and then trying to re-apprehend them ... that puts people at risk," Mayor Sandy Genis said after the vote.

        On the contrary, liberals told Xinhua that opposing the law would open the door to civil right's violations, and add work for already overburdened town cops who would be assisting in enforcement.

        "The foremost spokesman for local enforcement of immigration laws - Arizona's Joe Arpaio - was also heavily criticized for ignoring reports of sexual assault when they came from Latina and Black women," said former U.S. State Department official Stewart King.

        King told Xinhua that the Costa Mesa vote not only puts local cops on the firing line, but is simply not their job.

        "This is the job for (U.S.) Immigration and Naturalization (INS) officials - not the work of local sheriffs," said Louis Cardona, a former Arizona resident who told Xinhua he was personally abused by Arpiao's forces.

        "Arpiao had hundreds of sexual assault allegations go without investigation," said King, echoing social media concerned tweets after the Costa Mesa vote - that local law enforcement and immigration do not mix.

        "Oregon has had a similar law since the 1980s," said King, a college history professor.

        "State and local police are not empowered, funded, or trained to enforce immigration laws - that is the responsibility of federal immigration authorities," he told Xinhua.

        Editor: yan
        Related News
        Xinhuanet

        California's rebellious "sanctuary state" law faces rebellion

        Source: Xinhua 2018-05-07 05:05:01

        By Peter Mertz

        LOS ANGELES, May 6 (Xinhua) -- California conservative lawmakers continued this week to support Trump Administration immigration policy, a move that enflamed again the war of words in the state and feud between the America's most populous state and Washington.

        TANGLED LAW WARFARE

        California made history by becoming the first "Sanctuary State" in the country as a new law, which was called SB (Senate Bill) 54 before being signed by Governor Jerry Brown last October, showing a will to resist the White House's immigration policy, went into effect from the first day of this year.

        Then the Golden State had to face pressure from the federal government for its rebellious move. Early March, the Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against the state, its governor, and its attorney general, accusing them of violating the U.S. Constitution.

        This legal move was compared by Jerry Brown to "an act of war", but more challenges to the law, which vastly limits cooperation between state and local law enforcement officers with the federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, emerged inside his state.

        Costa Mesa, a tiny city of 110,000 residents south of Los Angeles, made another loud national statement with a 3-2 vote last Wednesday to oppose the state's "sanctuary state" law. It is the latest Orange County governing body to declare official opposition.

        The opposition to SB 54 started in March when Orange County's second-smallest city - Los Alamitos - voted 4-1 to exempt itself from California's sanctuary law.

        That move triggered Orange County's Republican-controlled county council to vote unanimously later that month to do the same - defy the state sanctuary laws - and move immigration control to the local level.

        County council members in the majority said SB-54 puts them at odds with the U.S. Constitution and also joined the federal lawsuit against California's sanctuary laws.

        Orange County lawmakers cited examples of "illegal" immigrants convicted of domestic violence that were re-released into the public, while liberal opponents voiced dismay at a move that will target minority populations.

        California Attorney General Xavier Becerra said he would fight Orange County in court, as all sides prepared for battle. "State law is state law," Becerra said in a news conference last month.

        "We want to make sure that every jurisdiction, including Orange County, understands what state law requires of the people and the subdivisions of the state of California," he said, warning "It's my job to enforce state law and I will do so."

        But now Becerra must file a long list of defendants to the court if he launched a law war against the rebellious cities. Besides of Costa Mesa, at least another 13 cities in Orange County voted against the "sanctuary law" and the neighbour San Diego County also decided to back Trump' s challenge against the state on this issue.

        CLEAR DIVISION LINE

        "Costa Mesa has been a conservative stronghold since the Nixon and Reagan years," said San Luis Obispo business owner John Ott.

        "Lots of rich, retired white folk live there - not a surprise vote - in fact, I'm surprised it was so close," Ott told Xinhua Friday.

        Orange County is more populous than 21 U.S. states, the sixth most populous country in America, and has only voted for only one democratic presidential candidate since 1936, who was Hillary Clinton.

        "The 3-2 Costa Mesa vote was not unanimous - in fact very close," said Hollywood film editor Tim Craig, "Hey, it's Orange County, what else would you expect?"

        The debate in Costa Mesa city council Wednesday morning was unexpected fierce. More than 100 people spoke on the issue over more than four hours in front of a large and sometimes rowdy crowd.

        People in the audience expressed both sides of the issue, waving American flags and holding signs with messages such as "Immigrants in, racists out," "You must uphold the Constitution," "Respect our country" and "I support safe communities, I support SB 54."

        Chairwomen of the meeting repeatedly admonished the audience for interrupting speakers with applause or boos. Several times she threatened to clear the chamber if the crowd didn't pipe down, and she asked police officers to temporarily remove people who were being disruptive.

        Costa Mesa's vote dismayed civil rights groups across America.

        "America is going backwards...marching to the Trump manifesto," political analyst David B. Richardson told Xinhua Saturday.

        "There's been a real shift to a national, xenophobic acceptability in our society that is heartbreaking," said Rabbi Jonathan Klein, executive director of the Clergy & Laity United for Economic Justice group on Twitter.

        "We're in an era of open bigotry," Klein said.

        "It has nothing to do with bigotry," countered former U.S. Navy engineer Kirk Blue. "Police are trained to protect the public and if that means including demographic data, then it's crazy to hamper their work," he told Xinhua.

        "Clearly the residents of Orange County want more law enforcement, not less," Blue said Saturday.

        MORE SAFEY?

        Costa Mesa's council members who supported the resolution said what they concerned most about SB 54 is that in many cases it prohibits local and state police agencies from notifying federal officials when they're about to release immigrants in their custody who may be subject to deportation.

        "If you are putting people back on the street and then trying to re-apprehend them ... that puts people at risk," Mayor Sandy Genis said after the vote.

        On the contrary, liberals told Xinhua that opposing the law would open the door to civil right's violations, and add work for already overburdened town cops who would be assisting in enforcement.

        "The foremost spokesman for local enforcement of immigration laws - Arizona's Joe Arpaio - was also heavily criticized for ignoring reports of sexual assault when they came from Latina and Black women," said former U.S. State Department official Stewart King.

        King told Xinhua that the Costa Mesa vote not only puts local cops on the firing line, but is simply not their job.

        "This is the job for (U.S.) Immigration and Naturalization (INS) officials - not the work of local sheriffs," said Louis Cardona, a former Arizona resident who told Xinhua he was personally abused by Arpiao's forces.

        "Arpiao had hundreds of sexual assault allegations go without investigation," said King, echoing social media concerned tweets after the Costa Mesa vote - that local law enforcement and immigration do not mix.

        "Oregon has had a similar law since the 1980s," said King, a college history professor.

        "State and local police are not empowered, funded, or trained to enforce immigration laws - that is the responsibility of federal immigration authorities," he told Xinhua.

        [Editor: huaxia]
        010020070750000000000000011105521371599871
        主站蜘蛛池模板: 片毛片免费看| 国产精品高潮呻吟视频| 激情久久久| 亚洲国产偷| 亚州精品中文| 国产人成看黄久久久久久久久| 夜夜精品视频一区二区| 中文字幕在线乱码不卡二区区| 日韩av中文字幕一区二区| 国产一区二区三区色噜噜小说| 国产69精品久久99不卡解锁版| 99精品国产99久久久久久97| 午夜av网址| 国产精品日韩一区二区三区| 国产91高清| 亚洲免费精品一区二区| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区三区不卡| 强制中出し~大桥未久4| 国产乱一区二区三区视频| 久久精品入口九色| 国产1区2区视频| www.久久精品视频| 免费久久99精品国产婷婷六月| 久久精品国产久精国产| 黑人巨大精品欧美黑寡妇| 88国产精品视频一区二区三区| 精品一区二区超碰久久久| 激情久久一区| 久久久久久国产一区二区三区| 久久久久久国产精品免费| 欧美日韩一区不卡| 欧美一区二区三区久久久| 99精品在免费线偷拍| 精品国产九九| 久久精品视频3| 国产欧美日韩另类| 色一情一乱一乱一区99av白浆| 国产资源一区二区三区| 国产精品久久二区| 狠狠色丁香久久婷婷综合丁香| 欧美一区二区三区片| 久久99精品久久久野外直播内容| www.日本一区| 日本99精品| 国产全肉乱妇杂乱视频在线观看| 国产性猛交| 99视频一区| 国产精品久久久久免费a∨大胸| 亚洲一区二区福利视频| 亚洲少妇一区二区三区| 麻豆国产一区二区| 久久久久国产精品www| 久久精品视频中文字幕| 一区二区三区毛片| 97人人模人人爽人人喊小说| 99久久久久久国产精品| 国产一区二区在| 国产精品国产三级国产专区53| 美日韩一区| 一区二区欧美精品| 亚洲欧洲日本在线观看| 欧美视屏一区二区| 欧美一区二区综合| 九九久久国产精品| 久久久久国产精品www| 亚洲精品久久久久www| 国产91久久久久久久免费| 日本午夜一区二区| 夜夜爱av| 国产免费观看一区| 亚洲欧美自拍一区| 午夜影院激情| 国产精品色婷婷99久久精品| 亚洲精品主播| 国产精品视频免费看人鲁| 日本精品一二三区| 精品久久小视频| 中文无码热在线视频| 欧美亚洲视频二区| 狠狠色狠狠色88综合日日91| 午夜三级大片| 99精品黄色| 国产精品天堂| 四季av中文字幕一区| 国产一区在线视频播放| 国产精品乱码一区| 欧美在线一区二区视频| 91超碰caoporm国产香蕉| 日韩精品久久一区二区| 国产欧美一区二区精品婷| 在线视频不卡一区| 激情久久影院| 国内精品久久久久影院日本| 国产91热爆ts人妖在线| 99久久精品免费看国产交换| 国产精品乱码一区| 国产精品99一区二区三区| 69久久夜色精品国产69–| 亚洲乱码一区二区| 99热久久精品免费精品| 欧美一区二区免费视频| 91热国产| 96国产精品| 欧美极品少妇xx高潮| 日本精品视频一区二区三区| 娇妻被又大又粗又长又硬好爽| 国产在线观看二区| 免费看片一区二区三区| 国产偷亚洲偷欧美偷精品| 粉嫩久久99精品久久久久久夜| ass韩国白嫩pics| 激情久久一区二区三区| 国产精品19乱码一区二区三区| 日本伦精品一区二区三区免费| 国产69精品久久久久app下载 | xxxx国产一二三区xxxx| 亚洲精品卡一卡二| 97人人澡人人爽人人模亚洲| 少妇高潮一区二区三区99小说| av不卡一区二区三区| 欧美日韩激情一区| 亚洲欧洲日韩在线| 强制中出し~大桥未久4| 国产区一区| 国产亚洲精品精品国产亚洲综合 | 日韩在线一区视频| 国产精品视频久久久久| 亚洲精品欧美精品日韩精品| 国产精品精品国内自产拍下载| 91高清一区| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 日韩中文字幕在线一区| 高清欧美精品xxxxx| 玖玖国产精品视频| 国产欧美三区| 国产精品欧美一区二区三区奶水 | 国产精品一区二区av麻豆| 国产日韩欧美第一页| 国产在线一卡| 久久一区二| 国产91白嫩清纯初高中在线| 国产精品国产一区二区三区四区| 亚洲欧美日韩国产综合精品二区| 国产精品19乱码一区二区三区| 综合久久一区二区三区| 欧美日韩国产一区二区三区在线观看| 久久99中文字幕| 国产一区二区中文字幕| 欧美日韩一级在线观看| 国产一区二区三区小说| 欧美高清性xxxxhdvideos| 久久精品一二三四| 中文字幕+乱码+中文字幕一区| 国产综合久久精品| 一区二区三区欧美在线| 国产欧美日韩综合精品一| 国产欧美日韩中文字幕| 欧洲亚洲国产一区二区三区| 国产精品一二二区| 香蕉视频在线观看一区二区| 亚洲麻豆一区| 国产视频二区在线观看| 欧美一区二区久久久| 国产精品久久免费视频| 日韩亚洲欧美一区| 国产精品一区二区中文字幕| 国产97免费视频| 97人人澡人人添人人爽超碰| 久久精品入口九色| 国产精品99999999| 色婷婷久久一区二区三区麻豆| 欧美精品在线观看一区二区| 欧美在线视频三区| 欧美日韩一区二区三区不卡| 香港日本韩国三级少妇在线观看| 欧美日韩一区在线视频| 99爱精品视频| 欧美精品五区| 国产精品二区一区二区aⅴ| 精品国产乱码久久久久久久| 久久精品男人的天堂| 国产69精品久久99不卡免费版| 肥大bbwbbwbbw高潮| 91麻豆精品国产91久久久久推荐资源| 欧美乱战大交xxxxx| 久久久久久久国产| 国产69精品久久99的直播节目| 国产白丝一区二区三区| 欧美一区二区三区性| 日韩午夜一区| 国产一区二区视频在线| 国产麻豆一区二区三区在线观看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久虫虫| 欧美在线精品一区| 国产伦精品一区二区三区免费下载| 亚洲精品国产一区| 国产日产精品一区二区| 97人人澡人人爽91综合色| 久久人91精品久久久久久不卡| 国产91九色在线播放| 狠狠色丁香久久婷婷综| 国产午夜精品一区二区三区欧美| 免费91麻豆精品国产自产在线观看| www.久久精品视频| 激情久久一区二区三区| 国产精品69久久久| 国产精品美女久久久免费| 国产精品国外精品| 国内少妇偷人精品视频免费| 午夜电影三级| 夜色av网| 欧美久久一区二区三区| 国产二区不卡| 浪潮av网站| 久久一区二区精品| 国产品久精国精产拍| 国产一区在线精品| 欧美一区二区三区激情在线视频| 久久精品国产精品亚洲红杏| 日韩精品免费一区二区三区| 欧美激情在线观看一区| 国产精品日产欧美久久久久| 久久aⅴ国产欧美74aaa| 欧美日韩国产欧美| 久久精品欧美一区二区| 91精品视频在线观看免费| 中文字幕在线一区二区三区 | 日韩女女同一区二区三区| 日韩中文字幕区一区有砖一区| 在线视频国产一区二区| 正在播放国产一区二区| 国产精品美女久久久免费| 亚洲日本国产精品| 国产区精品| 国产精品九九九九九九| 97久久超碰国产精品| 国产偷亚洲偷欧美偷精品 | 日韩精品中文字幕一区| 日本精品99| 国产在线精品一区| 国产精品欧美一区二区视频| 99久久国产综合精品麻豆| 午夜理伦影院| 日本免费电影一区二区三区| 亚洲午夜精品一区二区三区| 欧美一级特黄乱妇高清视频|